One of the strangest analyses I've ever seen in my life, and perhaps in all my readings of history. Two things happen in our world.
Firstly, distorting the truth into a rumor or lie, and the blame goes to the savage addiction to the "social destruction" media that led us to it. Rumors have become more reliable than any confirmed fact! The human mind vehemently rejects any truth on the pages of "social destruction." People have become addicted to rumors and lies!
Secondly, when anyone in our Arab countries even thinks, just thinks, about leaning towards something related to "human rights," the world goes crazy and goes after them with sanctions. Suddenly, all their economic analyses collapse. And the night becomes dark! But when a major country shuts down the economy of another major country overnight... and nationalizes all its projects and funds on its lands and the lands of its allies across the globe... the world stands with it and supports it. That's very normal, isn't it? Just a simple question, can any "foreign investor" trust that they can invest there when that major country treats another "foreign investor" in such a manner, with or without reason? Is that normal?
Are there no evaluations from international economic organizations criticizing such restrictions, punishments, and seizing foreign investors' rights? Like Fitch, Moody's, Standard & Poor's, and others?
No "human rights"?
Oh, right, the whole world keeps silent about Hiroshima, Bosnia, Herzegovina, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, and Lebanon. And they're having a meeting in Hiroshima today!
There was a famous American presenter in the early 80s who said, "They used to sentence homosexuals to death. Then, after several years, they started sentencing them to flogging and imprisonment. Then, after a few more years, they started sentencing them to a mere financial fine and humiliation." And at the end of his speech, he said, "I'm just afraid that after several years from today, homosexuality will become mandatory!!"
Oh, today in 2023, most Western countries are demanding "human rights" and "the rights of homosexuals." Meanwhile, they punish the player Mustafa Mohamed, despite his legitimate and human right to refuse to wear a jersey with a symbol supporting homosexuals!!
I'm sorry, really sorry. I'm just confused after reading these analyses. Clearly, I've been holding them upside down!
Comments